many people go to university for academic study. more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers. to what extent do you agree or disagree

Recently, there has been a large debate about the orientation upon graduating from high school. While I agree that more people should be encouraged to attend vocational training courses due to low tuition and demanding job, I do not neglect the need for university graduates in some special careers and priority recruitment jobs
On the one hand, there are various reasons why school-leavers should consider vocational training as the ideal choice. First, it helps people lessen the burden of family finance. That learning at university takes at least four years to be completed in comparison with 2-year vocational training is obvious. The less time people spend on studying, the less money they have to pay for education. Secondly, the demand for blue collar jobs is extremely urgent when most of the essential works in the society highly depend on this workforce. For example, as a part of modernization process, an unprecedented volume of new infrastructure is being built in some developing countries, and this can not be done without the contributions of manual workers.
On the other hand, pursuing academic studies at university still eventually surpass a vocational training in future achievement. First of all, some specials jobs such as doctors or teachers required many formal qualifications that have to be trained for a long term. For example, If a doctor were not taught about human anatomy at the university by successful professors, they would lack basic knowledge and cause detrimental health effects to the patients. Second, a variety of firms these days have preferred a university graduate employee than a physical labor. This results in the unemployments of a large number of people who attended vocational training.
In conclusion, it seems to me that both vocational training and academic study in universities are worth taking into account for high school graduates thanks to aforementioned benefits

Votes
Average: 9.6 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 610, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... This is result in the unemployments of a large number of people who attended vocational training...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, at least, for example, such as, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.228125 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89708737086 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596875 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9300851254 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331761816089 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102250594694 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817821896872 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218739459316 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419629728569 0.056905535591 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.