Recently, there has been a large debate about the orientation upon graduating from high school. While I agree that more people should be encouraged to do vocational training thanks to low tuition and saving time, I also believe that many people should go to university for academic study in some special job and prior position in companies.
On the one hand, doing vocational training delivers many benefits. First, it helps people lessen the burden of family finance. That learning at university takes at least 4 years to be completed in comparison with 2-year vocational training is obvious. The less time people spend on studying, the less money they have to pay for education. Secondly, it is no need for people to waste their time on studying some career-unrelated subjects which are taught in the university. For example, an electrician would find it fruitless to learn political subjects.
On the other hand, more people should learn at the university for various reasons. First of all, some specials jobs such as doctors or teachers required many qualifications that have to be trained for a long-term, not a short time. For example, If a doctor were not trained at the university by successful professors, they might insufficient knowledge and cause detrimental problems to the patients. Second, many firms today prefer a university-qualified employee than vocational-trained one. This is result in the unemployments of a large number of people who do vocational training.
All in all, although doing vocational training has some acknowledge benefits, I believe that people should go to university for academic study in some special career.
- Schools should not force children to learn a foreign language. To what estent do you agree with this statement? 78
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat. 61
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Please discuss the two views and give your own opinion. 56
- The consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... This is result in the unemployments of a large number of people who do vocational training. All...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, at least, for example, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24528301887 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11099063434 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592452830189 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.989222055 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2857142857 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407954888519 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137418385046 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994774445302 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276259820027 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451842512053 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.