Many people say that universities should only offer places to young students, while others say they should accept people of all ages, even if they did not do well at school. Discuss both views and give your opinions?
it is true that tertiary educations ought to teach young students, although some people think that universities are for all people, even if they did not acquire a good academic result at school. In my opinion, I consider that focus on young students bring benefits to the societies.
On the one hand, some people consider that tertiary educations should only accept young people who could learn better other ages and I agree. In other words, young often are not worried about money and pressure on their job because their parents support them. they could focus on studying and also enable to get better knowledge. According to Psychology magazine, people are under 25 years of age who could gain better knowledge than other age groups. Furthermore, they have a long time to devote the society, while older people have a short time.
On the other hand, it is often believed that it is better if universities are acceptable to people of all ages and people have a bad result at school. As some people when they were young, they were not opportunities to study university for a lot of reasons. that is fair to attend university when they have an opportunity, even they are old. For instance, there are a lot of universities in Vietnam, where are open to people of all ages. Another reason each person has a talent. although some people do not get high academic result at school, they are good at relationship or science. if they could attend community or science universities, they will develop their ability. This is an essential reason to contribute the development of society.
In conclusion, while people have many vary in their opinion, I think that the society will have a lot of advantage if tertiary education should focus on young people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is true that tertiary educations ought ...
^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...nly accept young people who could learn better other ages and I agree. In other words,...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are often
...ages and I agree. In other words, young often are not worried about money and pressure on...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...job because their parents support them. they could focus on studying and also enable...
^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
... study university for a lot of reasons. that is fair to attend university when they ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...nother reason each person has a talent. although some people do not get high academic re...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 586, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ey are good at relationship or science. if they could attend community or science ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84666666667 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58894229797 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496666666667 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1982902104 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.875 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3760535207 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12179986749 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781428129344 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226932509462 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581994271027 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.