Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader .Others think that people can learn leadership skills. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is believed that leadership is completely inborn; however, others argue that it is a skill that can be cultivated through training and experiences. This essay will examine both viewpoints in turn and culminate the writer's opinion.
Those who harbor the view that leadership is nature might insist that one of the most crucial factors involved in a talented leader is personal traits. As people tend to follow those who have physical height or beauty which is inherited. Moreover, being a good leader required the ability to deal with difficulties in any circumstances and this is solely congenital. In short, to be a great leader, people need to have aptitudes that not many people can have.
Although few instinctive features are contributing to a good leader, leadership skills need to be nurtured and flourished by practicing. To be a good leader, people need to enhance other skills such as public speaking, communication, and management skills. These are not naturally born but improve through practice. Therefore, if natural-born leader is not polished their skills, they will not be successful in their leadership careers. Additionally, knowledge is also considered the decisive feature to be a good leader and this is a process of learning and acquiring. As a result, people who were naturally born a leader will not become good leaders if they are not enhancing their skills.
This essay discussed that leadership requires factors that are inherited. Notwithstanding, these do not make sense if they do not develop.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...th viewpoints in turn and culminate the writers opinion. Those who harbor the view t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in short, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22267206478 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97731923687 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546558704453 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3890588528 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1428571429 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6428571429 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306017548795 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102437261546 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580575781284 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158006485471 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695561987209 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.