Nowadays, an increasing number of people are concerned about which learning curriculums could gain better efficiency. However, whether studying by using social media, the Internet or attending college/ university has caused heated debate. From my point of view, I believe that college or university is a standard location for obtaining knowledge.
First, there is no doubt that university education has a proper method of learning which students would easily find it comprehensive and understandable. In other words, students could obtain the most benefits by interacting directly with the lecturers whenever they need any supports for their lessons. University, therefore, plays an indispensable role in helping students surpass difficulties.
In addition, college or university is a suitable place where students could obtain practical and professional skills and become competitive in the job market. For instance, companies are always separated into smaller factors including a group of people, therefore, universities providing artificial working environments to encourage students to have team spirit and interact comfortably with their colleagues in the future. Furthermore, students are able to demonstrate better social integration with people.
That is not to say that distance-learning method is less beneficial than college or university. There are, of course, some students interested in broadening horizons in other subjects that were not taught at university, such as psychology, economic management, photoshop, etc. But still, the effect of university education is far more irreplaceable to impart knowledge to learners.
In conclusion, the major knowledge gained from university or college, guaranting a high rate of employment and thus making the society function well. Meanwhile, distance-learning course also plays as assistance to make good preparation after graduation.
- People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- The chart below gives information about car ownership per household in the UK from 1975 to 2005. 78
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 Measured in tonnes 84
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, of course, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.0 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26245285267 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672794117647 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6897255453 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2142857143 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129861722103 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455351460631 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521336711728 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713950588958 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562511160192 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.52 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.