In many schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts subjects (eg. languages) and boys choose science subjects (eg. Physics). What do you think are the reasons? Do you think that this tendency should be changed?
It is true that in some schools and universities, there is a difference in relation to subjects between the girls who tend to learn arts and the boys who often enroll in science classes. This tendency can be attributed to several reasons which will be further explained in the following paragraphs. From my perspective, this trend should stay unchanged.
The aforementioned tendency can be attributable to two main reasons. The preliminary reason is the personality of each gender. To be more specific, the girls are easily attracted by the subjects requiring carefulness and patience like arts. In contrast, the boys tend to be interested in the science subjects relating to calculation or analytical abilities. Another reason for this stance is the competence of each kid. To clarify, children tend to show exellent performance at their favourite subjects. That is why the girls and the boys enroll in classes about the subjects that those children are good at.
From my point of view, the difference in choosing the subjects between boys and girls should not be changed for some reasons. Firstly, if children are forced to learn a subject that they don’t want, resentment will be created inside children. Therefore, children tend to do something against the expectation of their parents, which will lead to some bad consequences. Another reason is the freedom of choices. To be more specific, parents as well as teacers should let children themselves choose the subjects that they want to learn. Furthermore, children’s decisions should be listened to and respected.
To recapitulate, personality and competence are two main reasons for this tendency and I myself hold a strong belief that this trend should be unchanged because as far as I am concerned, children should be entitled to decide which subjects they want to learn.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-27 | driverhiepkhachvnteam | 61 | view |
- Some people think that families have the most powerful influence on a child s development while others think that other factors such as televisions friends music etc have the biggest effects Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country s development and progress To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- task 1 11
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that can make films Digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- the chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sing the subjects between boys and girls should not be changed for some reasons. ...
^^
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts that they want to learn. Furthermore, children’s decisions should be listened ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, in contrast, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19463087248 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92495818573 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503355704698 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.7617646223 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0588235294 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298708384342 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967693619915 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533319066722 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193662864543 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024825163553 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.