There are bunch of sports athletes who promotes various sports products in different medium. These approach have both aspects positive and negative for players as well as public.
Giant firms, particularly engages to prepare things for sports, are higher the best player in the field and invest abundance money on them because their popularity among people could be made their products hit. Many manufacture are get success in this strategy. By endorsing plenty of money on players who have another way to gain income and people also get benefit to have good quality products. Because company produce product on the basis of player standard, people get good quality of stuff with their favourite sports through they get like icing on the cake. Moreover, players should have get all the details of company and products prior signed and make sure that with such products their reputation not be harmed, therefore sometimes for assuring they test stuff themselves.
On the other hand, these also brings so much problem with it. When company invests money on the player for specific products, they raise price of sports things so customers have to pay more money for it than usual price. Suppose the product does not match standard of quality which would be laid players and firms in criticize and would make others to not purchase things that could nitice sudden drop in their sales. This would have really adverse impact on players personal and professional life and might be diminished his or her career.I n addition, sports person would lose their popularity in people which they have needed prolong time,determination and hard work to create this image.
In conclusion, to keeping some measurement on the quality of product which make to benefinance of both sides of people, and manufacture satisfied with the sales of things by good profit margin.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'bunches'?
Suggestion: bunches
There are bunch of sports athletes who promotes various...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun manufacture seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much manufacture', 'a good deal of manufacture'.
Suggestion: Much manufacture; A good deal of manufacture
...eople could be made their products hit. Many manufacture are get success in this strategy. By en...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'got', 'gotten'.
Suggestion: got; gotten
...the cake. Moreover, players should have get all the details of company and products...
^^^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...d might be diminished his or her career.I n addition, sports person would lose th...
^
Line 5, column 642, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , determination
...ople which they have needed prolong time,determination and hard work to create this image. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09508196721 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43744858476 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560655737705 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.5625749869 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136348410473 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588379264872 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506323070927 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905169626784 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588850862555 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.