Many students are now refusing to choose science subjects at their university level. Why do you think this is happening and what is the impact on the community?
The overwhelming feeling of studying science in high school is why students avoid choosing STEM for higher education. Therefore, the surge of science research in the field is one of the impacts of this issue.
Many students resist taking science as their study area at the University due to the overbudening feeling during high school, making them lose interest in the field of study. More specifically, students are expected to understand an abundance of science theories at once while also learning about other school subjects. For instance, many high schools in Korea have included calculus as a learning material for 11th-grade students, which they are supposed to learn at university sophomore year. This resulted in a decrease in students choosing STEM for higher education by more than 20% in 2020 compared to previous years. Many students claim they are not interested in science because it is stressful.
Thus, the plummeting number of research is the impact of many students avoiding learning STEM at the university as many fields deprive eligible scientists in the future. This leads to the decline of development in many areas of science. For instance, a dip in students who applied for Marine Science Study at several state universities in Indonesia in the past five years led to a scarcity of experts in Marine Science. They are highly needed to develop a Tsunami prevention program in Indonesia as Indonesia has been prone to Tsunami during these past decades. Hence, the deprivation of experts in that field contributes to the slow development of the program.
To conclude, the dip amount of research is one of the problems of students neglecting to pick science study as their university major due to feeling overwhelmed since high school. If possible, the universities have to market the STEM major to be more attractive to attract students.
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways governments and individuals can tackle these problems 73
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon A new supermarket S is planned for the city The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket 78
- Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Average Household Expenditure in 2019 and 2020
- The bar graph below shows the stock price of four different technology companies from 2011 to 2016 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to stem'
Suggestion: To stem
...h school is why students avoid choosing STEM for higher education. Therefore, the su...
^^^^
Line 2, column 545, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to stem'
Suggestion: To stem
...lted in a decrease in students choosing STEM for higher education by more than 20% i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to stem'
Suggestion: To stem
...pact of many students avoiding learning STEM at the university as many fields depriv...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13486842105 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7882612031 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506578947368 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7272645614 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248395093854 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955949929226 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538630267861 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161860745081 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040301704714 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.