Many things that used to be done in the home by hand are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?

Essay topics:

Many things that used to be done in the home by hand are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?

It is true that nowadays several household chores such as washing the dishes and sweeping the floors are being done by machines. While I accept that this has both benefits and drawbacks, I would argue that there are more advantages than disadvantages.
On the one hand, there are two major drawbacks when many people are becoming too dependent on technology. Firstly, people relied on the automatic machines might lead to sedentary lifestyle. For example, earlier people used to do all work at home manually, but, at present the rise of machines such as robotic vacuum cleaner allows people cleaning their house without any efforts. Secondly, some machines do not only consume a lot of electricity but also lead to serious health issues. For example, oven with high temperature can both destroys beneficial nutrient such as vitamin C and causes cancer due to heating food process.
On the other hand, I support the view of those who believe that the benefits of those products outweigh the disadvantages. First, electronic machines for house chores save plenty of times as gadgets do tasks in lesser time than humans. For example, washing machine can wash clothes faster than manual washing. Additionally, a user can utilize time and complete several tasks at the same time. For example, a person can bake a cake in an oven and wash clothes in a machine simultaneously. Finally, the convenience of being able to use automatic machines in household routines is the effective performance of work. Microwaves, for instance, can both set time and temperature to avoid overcooked or undercooked.
In conclusion, I consider that the advantages of these machines outweigh the drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-15 ziaul1891 61 view
2019-11-15 ziaul1891 78 view
2019-09-17 sbsomaya 61 view
2019-09-17 sbsomaya 61 view
2019-07-23 Abi Mufti 73 view
Essays by user ngannt :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1496350365 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81745442611 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605839416058 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.308302669 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.0666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111949594182 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375768084806 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520450877031 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846317408662 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754080617834 0.056905535591 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.