Many young people today are leaving their homes in the countryside to move to cities. Why is this happening? What can be done to encourage young people to stay in rural areas?
Nowadays, metropolises have been ideal destination for entrepreneurs of twenties to begin their career, therefore the landscapes are left abandoned. In this essay, I will explain why this is the case and suggest viable solutions to this phenomenon.
Initially, some venture to urban areas to enjoy various modern entertainments. For instance, premiere movies, million-dollar musical concert are frequently conducted in big cities because they are densely populated, hence lucrative profits. Meanwhile, most households in the countryside live distantly which makes it challenging to organize considerable events.
More importantly, the majority of graduates travel to economic centres in search of better job opportunities. Urban enterprises usually offer higher salaries than ones in the rural regions, from about 1,5 to 2 times. Besides, these wealthy companies often provides employees with better perks such as maternity benefits, or rental accommodation. The absence of such bonuses is often seen in smaller businesses.
In order to reduce the situation, the government would impose a regulation that limit the possibility to settle in the urban. For example, an income line can be created to prohibit citizens earning below the given number. However, such top-down rule can cause regional conflict or even rebellious behaviours, while widen the income gap between classes.
A more effective remedy would be to subsidise agricultural towns. Institutional investments can motivate talented individuals to stay and try to enrich their hometowns. When the residential areas are well-invested, international companies will increasingly build facilities there.
In conclusion, it is obvious that career progression attracts youngsters throughout the nation and accordingly trigger countryside abandonment. However, when rural cities are financially supported, some entrepreneurs may employ the chance to develop their place.
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions. the provided bar chart illustrates the differences between the population of wealthy nations and developing nations during the 73
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000. The pollution levels are measured by Sulfur Dioxide and Smoke micrograms per cubic metre.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compariso 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. They are Art Gallery, Pavilion, Pier and FestivalSummarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 84
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'organizing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: organizing
...ve distantly which makes it challenging to organize considerable events. More importantl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, hence, however, may, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.03260869565 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20912855635 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.721014492754 0.561755894193 128% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3235129806 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.9411764706 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2352941176 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140419635034 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354709642731 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323947516693 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0631290777906 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029935212903 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.4 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.52 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.