The media should include more stories that report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this digital era, with the quick spread of the mass media, it is suggested by some that journalists and television stations should increase their coverage of more articles containing good news. From my point of view, although the good news is practically beneficial for readers, bad news has its own value which should not be underestimated.
On the one hand, there are two major reasons why citizens prefer to choose meaningful and encouraging stories with a priority on different media channels. To begin with, good news could have positive effects on the community. For instance, an article reporting how a group of students is contributing to environmental preservation through their actions, like picking up the garbage on the street or planting trees, can mean a lot. Thus, readers would feel a sense of admiration towards those making an effort to protect the Earth and feel motivated to do the same. Additionally, these contents of social media help restore our faith in humanity, which will encourage readers to stay optimistic, supportive, and helpful. Furthermore, in the intricate context of the COVID-19 pandemic, people desperately need positive news from the government as vaccines are the only way to eliminate the pandemic and have been deployed to help people get vaccinated. Therefore, people feel more secure, more hopeful, and ready to go back to work and start a new normal life.
On the other hand, adverse news has its own set of benefits, which help individuals to stay aware of problems around them and take appropriate measures. First and foremost, this figure gives humans a deeper view of the present reality. This kind of reporting enables the news to cast light on many of the world's existing problems that need tackling. Without bad news, people may misunderstand certain facts and make the wrong decisions. Moreover, since stories of violence and crime are given priority as the top stories of the day, citizens can grasp the meaning of a law-abiding mindset and gradually stay away from criminal activities associated with taking action to resolve this phenomenon. Another illustration is the increasing reports of plastic and air pollution, which has caused serious damage to all living beings, such as respiratory diseases and climate change. As a result, the government and people might start a movement to restrict the use of plastic products.
In conclusion, in spite of the fact that releasing good news articles in the mass media will have benefits and inspire others, I consider that adverse news will illustrate the problems that people do not deal with well. Hence, they can offer suitable measures to solve these drawbacks well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alue which should not be underestimated. On the one hand, there are two major rea...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 979, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to restrict the use of plastic products. In conclusion, in spite of the fact that...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... measures to solve these drawbacks well.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, as a result, in spite of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2261.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 438.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16210045662 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78104403369 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 176.041082164 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598173515982 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.669005968 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.3125 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210789989026 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604392678613 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490409557453 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134698094023 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434937200208 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.