Over the past decades, exploration of entities in outer space never ceased to draw public attention and provoke debates. Although universal research has achieved unexpected results, the issue as to whether governments should spend a lot of money on space travelling or not remains controversial. To the best of my knowledge, the investment in space research can be paid off in the future for the following reasons.
Firstly, it is important to recognize that our planet is dealing with natural resource shortage, exhausting fossil resource problems. Many argue that these problems can be tackled by creating new artificial material to supersede conventional resources. This argument could be true to some extent. However, they should take into account the fact that many natural resources cannot be replaced easily and the policy of using alternative materials is long-term and waste money strategy. For example, rare metals such as gold, silver, which are eventually be depleted as industrial production expands, are rare on the Earth but it might exist at huge amount in another planet outer. This example indicates that universal discovery is considerable approach to address exhausting resource problems.
Secondly, it is equally important to recognize that space research contribute significant knowledge about natural phenomena in the Earth. Opponents may argue that these contributions are just a minor of the issue because many phenomena occurring in our planet such as global warming, raising of sea level, the loss of rainforests and others are caused by overexploitation of human. This argument is reasonable to some extent, but they are ignorant of the fact that the interaction between the Earth and universe, space objects and our planet is essential, curial in finding solution for natural problems. For instance, human and other creatures on the Earth can avoid an explosion caused by collision between meteorites and the Earth by controlling and changing the orbit of meteorites before they approach the Earth. This example shows that space exploration plays an instrumental role in predicting the threatens to living in the Earth in general and human in particular.
In conclusion, in no circumstances should governments reduce budget for space research because it not only resolve the resource shortage problems but also prove pivotal knowledge to adjust natural phenomena on the Earth as mentioned above.
- The chart below show the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000, will projection till 2050. 67
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. 73
- in order to improve the quality of education, high school students should be encouraged to evaluate and criticise their teachers, but others think that it will result in loss of respect and discipline in classroom. what is your opinion? 84
- The Graph show the proportion of the population 65 aged and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.-Syerapke- (rewrite) 73
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much universal research', 'a good deal of universal research'.
Suggestion: much universal research; a good deal of universal research
...attention and provoke debates. Although many universal research has achieved unexpected results, the is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... achieved unexpected results, the issue as to whether governments should spend a lot of money...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4417989418 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89321366497 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544973544974 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2650286403 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.133333333 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173184238648 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059947195778 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333209424389 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106379583781 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178297352196 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.