In modern life, it is possible to shop, work and communicate via the internet without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development?
It is true that a wide variety of everyday tasks, including shopping and working, are being carried out online, without in-person contact. Personally, I believe this trend brings both positive and negative consequences.
On the one hand, the trend towards conducting day-to-day tasks through the Internet could raise people’s standards of living. Firstly, the birth of Internet shopping has benefited people who are too busy to shop in brick-and-mortar stores or those with disabilities and cannot leave their homes. Giving people the ability to shop without coming to physical stores helps them save time or fulfill their lives in a way that offline shopping never can. Secondly, social media has allowed us to talk to people from the other side of the world. This helps to boost productivity as information can be exchanged more rapidly and precisely, avoiding interruptions and delays. Moreover, people can enjoy more flexible working schedules because they can work without having to enter the office.
However, this trend could have its disadvantages. Face-to-face contact plays a crucial role in developing people’s social skills. Although people can chat or text each other, they have fewer opportunities to enhance their body language skills or the capability to read people’s facial expressions. Besides, if people are too absorbed in the online world, they are more likely to distance themselves from reality. This means that they are less eager to invest in building and developing real-life relationships, most of which are healthier than virtual ones.
In conclusion, with the help of the Internet and technology, people can lift some of their burden of daily tasks. However, this trend could also harm people’s relationship and their social ability.
- Describe the diagram about the hydroelectric dam 78
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel Do you agree or disagree 78
- The best way to solve world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion 89
- Society is based on rules and laws If individuals were free to do whatever they want to do it could not function To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 73
- Describe the diagram about the hydroelectric dam 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40794223827 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82054598885 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635379061372 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8594480496 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8666666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183962817407 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603609143582 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613512623434 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104916949858 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349459641394 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.