Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others.
Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are need by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding.
Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages?
Part of the society argue that the present civilisation only require experts in some areas, and not in others. Thus, it is said that university fees for subjects that are considered as necessary should be free and the opposite is said to the less popular fields. From my perspective, the drawbacks of this policy would outweigh the upsides.
On the one hand, if this educational policy is imposed, it will still have certain merits. By eliminating all costs for university curriculum of the need-by-society subjects, there would be more students and parents pay attention to these subjects, which subsequently would lead to a rapid rise in the number of specialists when the students themselves graduate. As a result, there would be more labour for future research into important issues, such as solving the conundrum related to environment and climate change, whose process would be accelerated due to the increase in labour.
On the other hand, i myself opine that there is no such "useless" field as part of the society suppose, and it would be unfair for those who are dedicated in the professions that are considered as "less relevant" by people. Despite objections raised by the majority, the advantages these minors have brought to humanity so far are undeniable. To exemplify, research into the past (history) is generally viewed as having few contributions to the human race's development, however, these findings are proved to have played an irreplaceable role in clarifying national borders as well as ease the war frictions between countries. In this regard, i reckon that these minors are not fully irrelevant as they have always been seen.
In conclusion, it is obvious that some subjects which are highly needed in modern societies ought to be stimulated by numerous ways. Then again, i think this educational policy is not so rational and should not be approved owing to some demerits i have discussed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-07 | Tường Vân | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Selena17_ | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-14 | hieu13092006 | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-25 | levanhoan123 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-19 | Awadhesh Mourya | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 78
- The diagrams below show stages in the development of simple cooking equipment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram show how plate glass and bottle glass are made Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the environmental issues raised by a product over it life cycle Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 41
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'races'' or 'race's'?
Suggestion: races'; race's
...s having few contributions to the human races development, however, these findings ar...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 661, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ions between countries. In this regard, i reckon that these minors are not fully ...
^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...timulated by numerous ways. Then again, i think this educational policy is not so...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, then, thus, well, i reckon, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15506329114 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99190242678 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.114737316 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.75 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226172469728 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716457872852 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727766761028 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13589527992 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450284568796 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.