Recently, whether people should still use food, clothes or medicine originating from animals remains a controversial topic. From my perspective, thanks to the technological advancements in agriculture, medicine and clothing, we are completely able to adap our essential demands without killing animals.
To begin with, people have eaten meat as a main source of protein and many important nutrients. Meat also became an integral part of many cuisines around the world. However, we are able to live on a plain-based diet which provide sufficient nutrients with only food grains and vegetables. Futhermore, many surveys have proven that being a vegetarain will reduce the risk of conmmiting to many dieseas such as cancer and heart attacks.
Moreover, humans used animals to make medicines or samples for experimenting medicines. For instance, poison of snakes has been used to make sedatives that reduce pain and there are many experiments using animals sush as rabbits, dogs, mokeys for samples. However, in fact, the synthetic chemicals are more effective in reducing pain and sacrificing an animal’s life for a experiment seems to be extremely brutal.
As for clothing, there is no need to use animals in this way. In the past, people reared sheep and hunted bears for wool, which would effectively keep their warm. However, nowaday, comparing to leather, farbic and these other artificial materials which are more adapable and cheaper, wool is no longer a reasonable choice.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe that sacrificing animals for food, clothing and medicine is absolutely unnecessary and we also need to respect animals’ right to live freely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...d sacrificing an animal's life for a experiment seems to be extremely brutal...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, as for, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42641509434 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91576288359 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641509433962 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8692797692 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.615384615 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217643259913 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803219030735 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661938488578 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122074617172 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581381159731 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.