More and more companies allow their employees to work from home or “remotely” rather than going into an office each day.
Do the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages?
Modern technology allows many people to communicate and collaborate in ways that make reporting to an office unnecessary. Even though working outside an office environment may negatively affect productivity and efficiency for some workers, the benefits of flexibility justify these drawbacks.
Undoubtedly, some people will be happier and more productive working in a traditional office setting. Without a space optimized for work, some employees will be less efficient. In an office, basic supplies like paper and printers are always available. A support staff is there to offer help with daily tasks and technical problems. Additionally, working remotely can make it difficult for some workers to separate themselves from distractions like pets, kids, and other non-work tasks. The simple fact is that some people require an office environment to thrive.
Nevertheless, for those who can avoid distractions and remain focused, remote work be an invaluable perk. The simple but profound benefit is flexibility. Life and work do not always line up perfectly. For employees with families, being able to work from home might allow them to drop off and pick up their kids at school each day, or attend an important event like a musical concert. For others, flexibility means they can log out in the middle of the day to get some exercise at the gym. Finding balance between work and home is a major obstacle for many in the modern workforce. Too many people simply can’t manage all of their competing responsibilities, and they get burned out. From a company’s perspective, offering the opportunity to work remotely could prevent talented employees from quitting or getting overworked.
For these reasons, employers should offer their workers increased flexibility to perform their duties remotely whenever possible. Employees will be happier and more productive because they can find balance in their lives, and this will almost certainly have a positive impact on the company’s bottom line.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | lalleNATA | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | Krushnagopal | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | Krushnagopal | 56 | view |
- Every organisation is more likely to know the skillset of the individual, who is a part of it through some evaluations and giving feedback. Despite, most of them are not likely to get evaluated. Causes of this problem are due to the consequences of being 73
- The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Education, from preschool through university, should be paid for by the government and therefore free to students. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Many people have difficulty maintaining a healthy diet . What are the causes of this problem? How could it be solved? 56
- Diagram 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of flexibility justify these drawbacks. Undoubtedly, some people will be happier...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4249201278 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95053761244 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603833865815 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2331521898 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3888888889 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 7.06120827912 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284111570106 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818229362284 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571988807921 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164662615128 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525813081479 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.