In the contemporary world, technology plays an indispensable role in people’s daily lives and it brings a lot of benefits to individuals. Consequently, a massive number of employees in numerous enterprises is enabled to work at home. From my observation, this is a positive improvement for the following reasons.
It is undeniable that the more employees work at home, the fewer congestions can happen. On account of the number of workers working at their own accommodations, the number of vehicles on roads will be declined considerably as they can do their works or have meetings online without any transports concern. Furthermore, this development also helps to reduce the amount of carbon footprint that comes from vehicles so that it can prevent individuals from the pollution which is one of the biggest issues that people have to face up within recent years.
The next beneficial cause of this improvement is the convenience of the workplace for employees. Because they are allowed to work at their houses, they will have a comfortable atmosphere to focus on their works. Much as many people concede that the calm atmosphere will not bring quality results for employees, the situation is actually the opposite since comfortable workspaces such as homes will give laborers effective results that satisfy their demands by reducing stressful times and concentrating on their works more and more. Thus, allowing workers to work at home is probably a great development for society.
To conclude, I utterly concede that this is a positive improvement that firms should continue this new regulation for their staffs in the foreseeable future.
- the plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 73
- With the increase in the use of mobile phones and computers fewer people are writing letters Some people think that the traditional skill of writing letters will disappear completely To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your opinions 73
- The map shows changes between 1960 and now in Station Street 73
- The bar chart illustrates the number of people in the UK eating more than 5 portions of vegetables and fish per day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, furthermore, so, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02593435092 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587121212121 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.7484964256 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.545454545 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256442565418 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106006056256 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995825394389 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135666754517 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676082600033 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.