The table detailed elucidates the level of weekly consumption of ordinary milk and butter healthy alternative in one European region.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that adolescents tend to consume less milk and butter especially those under 25 years old even though full fat is the highest for that group. Another fascinating point is that the elderly who are over 65 years old ingest the most milk, primarily low fat, whereas people from 45 to 65 years old eat the most butter.
Under the age of 25, the average amount of milk consumed is 1200ml, with 59% of it being full fat and 41% is low fat. For older adults, the trend is typically inverted, with persons aged 26-45, 25-65, and 65+ drinking 1650ml, 1670ml, and 1900ml, respectively. Fat content is considerably reduced, with 20%, 45%, and 30% for those aged 26 to 45, 45 to 65, beyond aged 65 accordingly and reciprocal figures for low-fat consumption.
Younger individuals also use the least amount of butter, at only 12g, opposed to 19g for those from 26 to 45, and 60g and 30g for the two older generations correspondingly. Younger people prefer more fat (60% full fat to 40% low fat) whilst elderly people have significantly lowered proportions in this group (38% full fat for 26-45 and around 50% for everyone over 45).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'lowed', 'lowered'.
Suggestion: lowed; lowered
...hilst elderly people have significantly lower proportions in this group 38% full fat ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83185840708 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65246203732 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615044247788 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.1983455379 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.5 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142311754395 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09738687759 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137037788368 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158482517387 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172221402508 0.0819641961636 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.