More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In contemporary, due to the revolution of technology, the young have been exposed to state-of-the-art digital gadgets since their parents believe this could be a chance for accumulating practical technological skill. In my personal opinion, there are more harms than goods.
To commence with, it is acknowledged that children benefit significantly from advanced devices for relevant competences. In fact, these tools are utilized in quest of latest information and knowledge because they are published online. Hence, this enables children to look for necessary theories as well as online materials to serve for education purpose. By doing that, seeking proficiency is trained for the better and they are more independent in comprehending themselves.
Disadvantages, nonetheless, seem to overshadow. First, if this is put into practice, offsprings will suffer more downturn of either abilities or soft skills. To illustrate, communication skill is one of the compelling examples which is adversely affected by being in front of the high-tech gadgets as computer. It is easy to seize that when spending much time for doing so, they lessen opportunities for having a chat in person or even getting together with their peers. As a result, children's skills would rather be worsen. In addition, the habit of gluing the eyes on computer's screen or such devices probably leads to sedentary lifestyle or they even join hand in household chores. These activities are considered as vital skills that would assist them in building an independent lifestyle. Thus, parents have to have wisdom and proper control, otherwise, their kids are easy to gain drawbacks rather than benefits.
In conclusion, though this development has brought numerous positives for the growth of children, they are more likely to be worse.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | susannora | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Pham Van Nhan | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | Phuong Tran | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | rachell | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-17 | Linhdung | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ng practical technological skill. In my personal opinion, there are more harms than goods. To...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...fact, these tools are utilized in quest of latest information and knowledge because they ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, look, nonetheless, so, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44839857651 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04751861588 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658362989324 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9216340167 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.066666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258169643248 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762369371503 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530438557584 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165591364119 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324799211662 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.