with more and more people communicating via computers and mobile telephones, there is a real danger that we are losing the ability to communicate with others face to face. Do you agree or disagree.
Over the past few decades, there has been a stimulating discussion surrounding the issues of communication skills. Some people argue that due to the development of technology, the capacity for interaction has dramatically decreased in the modern lifestyles and I profoundly agree that this phenomenon will destroy people’s socialization.
There are obvious reasons why advanced technological devices affect people’s ability to communicate. The most noteworthy issue is, prevailing text-message through the computer or mobile phone has become an integral part of their lives. For instance, providing sustainable improvement of technology allows people to convey their information and message more easily than meeting up in one place. As a consequence, the lack of nurture speaking skills may gradually disappear in the future generation. The second most prominent one is that people always facing the technological devices offer up opportunities for them to obtain their friends current information through the Facebook or Instagram. In contrast, communication skills such as eye contact may be deprived in the scientific world.
Despite the reasons of agreement, there are some people that disagree with technologies in which have detrimental effect on their aptitude of interaction. Theoretically, linguistics are provided as an innate for human being and educated constantly during people’s growing process. Hence, the risk of losing the face to face communication may not be vulnerable to devastate.
In conclusion, although it may seem that mobile phones or computers have negative impacts on people’s communication, it is a fact that speaking is human’s natural function. In the future, if people can balance their social space between gadgets and people, the problems of interaction skills may not be a controversial debates.
- Around the world, politicians are generally not trusted or often considered corrupt. Why do you think this is the case and what should politicians be doing to improve their reputation amongst their citizens? 84
- with more and more people communicating via computers and mobile telephones there is a real danger that we are losing the ability to communicate with others face to face Do you agree or disagree 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 330, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'debate'?
Suggestion: debate
...ction skills may not be a controversial debates.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81751824818 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35766423358 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627737226277 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0298705037 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.615384615 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188261744769 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633782086372 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519907556707 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109337177494 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443132997591 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.