More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses. Why? Who benefit more from this, the community or these young people?
There is a growing number of the young who are from prosperous nations take part in voluntary projects such as education or housing construction in poorer countries. This phenomenon is caused by kindness of the young, and both volunteers and the community gain equal benefits.
The main reason why young people from wealthy countries are willing to offer vital help is that they want to share their love with residents in need. In developed countries, there is better conditions including higher standard of living, cutting-edge technology in comparison with undeveloped countries. Meanwhile, many disheartening news are shown every day, for example natural disasters resulting in homes to be lost or children not allowed to get to school. So that, the young who are from prosperous nations present a proactive way of doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses to help citizens in difficult circumstances and make world a better place.
It is undoubted that both the young volunteers and the community could equally have merits from this phenomenon. Regarding the young, volunteering brings them a chance to build an attractive resume for international university. One of the criteria to evaluate foreign students is the volunteering they participated in. Moreover, young people also improve their soft skills and be mature after aiding people in poorer countries. For local society, quality of life there is heightened by warmhearted actions. For instance, the lack of education has a tendency to decrease, and children can study lots of knowledge such as foreign languages, science and essential skills without tuition.
In conclusion, the young from first world countries move to underdeveloped ones to do unpaid work because of their kindness. It seems that both volunteers and the area that receives help can gain some certain values.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-21 | phanhhh | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | vivitoben | 82 | view |
| 2021-06-29 | vothihuongdungvn | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-29 | vothihuongdungvn | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Dongvo | 87 | view |
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses Why Who benefit more from this the community or these young people 84
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses Why Who benefit more from this the community or these young people 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 174, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are better conditions'?
Suggestion: there are better conditions
...idents in need. In developed countries, there is better conditions including higher standard of living, cu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 315, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much disheartening news', 'a good deal of disheartening news'.
Suggestion: much disheartening news; a good deal of disheartening news
... with undeveloped countries. Meanwhile, many disheartening news are shown every day, for example natura...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33447098976 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90248507671 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600682593857 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9960315273 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.642857143 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311153991927 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956387580147 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881097144165 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185825977263 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298870130932 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.