In most countries, with the widespread use of the Internet, people have more freedom to choose to work and study at home instead of traveling to work or college. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
The omnipresence of the Internet has opened up a new possibility for people to finish their jobs without leaving the comfort of their homes. From my perspective, I strongly believe in the perks of this trend overshadowing its demerits due to several following justifications.
There are a whole host of compelling arguments explaining the remarkable popularity of working or studying online. One obvious merit is that these workers and students do not need to waste their enormous efforts and financial resources on commuting and transportation. Indeed, it is quite discouraging to hurriedly rush into a public bus in the early morning, waiting for hours of traffic congestion before finally reaching their work destination. Such a hectic life no longer emerges for those who opt for online working and learning. In addition, this whole new approach also gives people the flexibility to arrange their time around their own lifestyles. This means that distant workers and learners are put to comfort and convenience as they are not restricted to a fixed schedule, which in turn arouses their desire to complete tasks more effectively.
ò
On the other hand, some people harbor a concern that too much freedom deprived of this method can lead to low productivity of work. This is because those workers and learners can be easily distracted by housing burdens such as doing the babysitting or washing the dishes, thereby procrastinating in their work. Such factors may also make them develop a sense of indiscipline and neglection towards their work in the foreseeable future.
In conclusion, despite the drawbacks of lower working and learning efficiency as mentioned, I hold my notion that people far more benefit from distance working and learning in terms of its aforementioned flexibility
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-09 | Nhật Huy Trần | 95 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The omnipresence of the Internet has ope...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to several following justifications. There are a whole host of compelling arg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...ions. There are a whole host of compelling arguments explaining the ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ò
...e to complete tasks more effectively. ò On the other hand, some ...
^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o complete tasks more effectively. ò On the other hand, some people harbor a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir work in the foreseeable future. In conclusion, despite the drawbacks of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, may, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27177700348 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99989680406 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637630662021 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6350132127 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.083333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158418131188 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05834144662 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384148592818 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980174962852 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037934068689 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.