The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In the fast-paced life, a lot of people perceive that science should be concerned to make people's lives become much better. I partly agree to this opinion.
A better living standard for people is the most crucial aim of scientific research because of two factors. First of all, almost scientific research is implemented by people, so they must benefit from there before considering towards advantages of other subjects such as animals or plants. Therefore, people could target to the prospects by the development of science, especially medical achievements which can help people live healthier. Furthermore, resources for research are limited and they would be saved for people. A wide range of fields require enormous financial resources from governments. For instance, the budget for purchasing vaccines to treat the Covid-19 pandemic for people's new normal life is very high, contributing to the financial burden of developing countries such as Vietnam or Laos. Not just the fact that people must face more and more pandemic in their lives but also they become more vulnerable because of the hard work in modern life, and science could resolve this problem.
On the other hand, there are several drawbacks if sciene is only prioritised to people. Firstly, there could have been numerous animals used for science experiments at risks, hence wiping out in their population. This would not be also virtuous if there were a lot of deaths. Secondly, people could be better without depending on science. Take music or film as an example. These artistic sources do play a crucial role in people's mental health, which do not require any sacrification. Thus, science could target to another dedication such as reserving or regenerating extinct animals.
To summarize that, from my perspective although science is still very essential for people, scientists should not ignore other living beings throughout the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 586, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erving or regenerating extinct animals. To summarize that, from my perspective a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30163934426 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71127122747 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603278688525 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6919943873 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1176470588 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221783672022 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712406077128 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600990521948 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157471814303 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576865602967 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.