Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced. They only care about how much it costs. How true is this statement? What influences people when they buy food?
People’s nutrition has stood out of all priorities since the down of time. Throughout history, it has been a controversial issue that which aspect of food is more important, the way of food that produced or the food cost. It is agreed that preparing lucrative meal or be aware of how food ingredients come to grocery's encasement are very significant to live longer. This argument will be proven by looking at how food production can be advantageous to people health.
For one, health is one of the main criteria of everybody. People health has a direct relation with what they consume. Although the food industry is under the supervision of health and food organization, but it does not mean that people lose their attention about how the foods made and what the ingredients are.
It is said that other factors such as advertisement or discount attempt people to buy inappropriate foods. For instance, in recent age with developing of technology, some restaurants or stories take most amounts of their budget to advertisement with eye-caching discount to persuade people to buy. As this show, it jeopardizes their health.
In addition, a person had a busy work schedule, which they cannot find enough time to eat homemade food. Thus, they buy frozen or packet food to save time. However, there are others who have big family, so, they have to consider their finance to buy cheap as well as huge quantity of food.
In conclusion, it has been proven that cost is only one of the factors that people consider when they purchase food. In my point of view, it depends on not only people's finance circumstances bat also other factor like time, quality and a lot of other similar factors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-22 | saeed_S_1368 | 61 | view |
- studies for career reasons or interest 73
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and trying to reserve these animals is a waste of resources. To what extant do you agree or disagree? 71
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and way of life died of. It is pointless to try to keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Do you agree or disagree living with animals, such as owing a pet, cat or bird, is good for people? Use personal examples to illustrate your response. 56
- proportion of population aged 65 and over in Japan, Sweden and USA 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85813148789 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75655870914 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.593561787 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413476608976 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129390042244 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076914009012 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209209086599 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536647861297 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.