In most successful organizations, some people believe that communications between managers and workers is important, other people said that other factors are more important. Discuss both of this view and give your opinion?
It is widely argued that what factors should have in most successful organizations. Some people believe that communications between managers and workers is crucial , but some individuals claim that other factors are more impressive. In my opinion, I think that it would be better to balance both of this view.
I the one hand, nowadays, many enterprises focus highly on creating relationship between managers and workers because they assume that communications is purely important. As far as I know, workers dedication is necessary in foundation pathway, thus firms always brings huge welfare in order to attract workers. Behind this point of view is that firms would have loyal people, they could make the best of progress for work. Moreover, communications between them would be closer, hence these tasks become easily. According to the report in 2017, most companies go bankrupt due to falling in connection between workers and managers. Exceptionally, a famous apartment in process called golden palm stopped because of lacking workers. Most workers said that they had to work for a long hour, yet their salary was definitely low so they decided to work for another company.
In the other hand, I strongly believe that other factors are impressive as well in successful organizations. There are numerous factors to create triumph for organizations such as structure or content. In term of content, people need to have a reasonable tenor in order to attract to investors. For instance, a new program called Shark Tank is an interesting since investors would create a chance for people starting up already if they have potential content. Moreover, about structural, people need to have a perfect structure from machinery to worker. Most big enterprises always concentrate on good quality of machinery in spite of price, thus their reputation spread out in the world. For example, “Honda” Japan brand of vehicles becomes universal to people living in Southeast Asia due to wonderful its facilities.
In conclusion, personally, I assume that creating successful organizations bases on the combination between all views at the same time
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-14 | tien.xinh.ne | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | tien.xinh.ne | 84 | view |
- When children start school, teachers have more influence on their intellectual and social development than their parents. Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Some employers find that their new employees lack in basic interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team. What are the causes of this problem? Suggest solutions. 73
- Being a celebrity-such as a famous film star or sports personality-bringsproblem as well as benefits.Do you think being celebrity brings more benefits ormore problems? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... between managers and workers is crucial , but some individuals claim that other f...
^^
Line 3, column 727, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Japan) must be used with a third-person verb: 'brands'.
Suggestion: brands
...d. For example, 'Honda' Japan brand of vehicles becomes universal to people...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32352941176 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9962868637 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8437549795 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.555555556 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344507850509 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097024213378 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100337026603 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214362208029 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148284060134 0.056905535591 261% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.