World populations tend to move from rural to urban centers. This causes various issues for both rural and urban areas. I think that government should take measures to tackle these problems.
On the one hand, rapid urbanization poses a big challenge on public resources of the cites. With the increase number of people living in the cities, there is continuous shortage of houses, particularly in the urban center with a high density of population. For example, Hong Kong is one of the most famous metropolises in the world, and the price of the housing is hardly to afford by ordinary dwellers who would have to squeeze themselves in tight spaces lower than average level. Dense populations also put heavy burden on public traffic. It create serious traffic congestion, especially in the rush hour.
On the one hand, urbanization would harm the economy in rural areas dramatically. The decrease of rural population affects local industries, such as agriculture, fisheries and forestry. If the youngsters in these regions are more likely to live in the cities and find jobs there, it would lead to a shortage of workforce, and hinder the development of local economy. For example, in China, there are only old people and children left in some villages of the rural areas.
The government should act to solve these problems. For cities, governments should build sustainable and environment-friendly cities. It means that governments should regulate industries to ensure sustainable way of development, such as waste dispose, clean energy use, low-carbon emission in traffic. In addition, government should improve the infrastructure like healthcare, housing and education. For rural areas, governments should give financial support for younger generations to use their technologies to traditional industries, and it would boost the development of local economy.
In conclusion, urbanization would be a tendency of modern society which would create new problems for both rural and urban areas, and i agree that government should act efficiently to guarantee the healthy development for both areas.
- Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion 79
- Traffic and housing problems in major cities can be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside To what extent do you agree with this opinion 84
- The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities can cause serious problems in both places What are the serious problems and what measures can be take to solve the problems 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creates'?
Suggestion: creates
... put heavy burden on public traffic. It create serious traffic congestion, especially ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 610, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ongestion, especially in the rush hour. On the one hand, urbanization would harm...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ems for both rural and urban areas, and i agree that government should act effici...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4103343465 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02742886351 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55623100304 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8068873517 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8888888889 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0762429455713 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0248969846121 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302848734281 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0499497055366 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330770345592 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.