News have no connections to people’s lives, so it is a waste of time to read the news in newspaper or watch news on TV programmes. Agree or disagree?
Many people argue that there is no use in reading the newspaper or watching news programs because news is irrelevant to people’s lives. Personally, I completely disagree with this view for several reasons.
A certain amount of news, in fact, have a direct or indirect influence on original people’s various life aspect. For one thing, the information regarding the occurrence in the local environment may affect public’s decisions on their plans or daily activities for work, study, or leisure. For example, weather forecasts on newspapers or TV news could give readers or viewers some clues or references for the choice of their proper clothes or the arrangement of outdoor activities. Similarly, the latest government policies, regulations, or laws published on newspapers or TV are inextricably linked to civilians’ personal interests, such as the social welfare they are entitled to and the civil obligation that they have to abide by.
Even for the news that is not closely related to people’s interests, knowing it may not be time-wasting as long as a certain form of value it offered. First of all, some news coverage about the scandals of celebrities or the results of matches on sports sections could hardly affect people’s life quality but does provide ideal common topics for daily communicating or socializing with friends, colleagues or family members.
In conclusion, I believe that reading newspapers or watching news programs not only not time-wasting but also beneficial to our life/ informatively beneficial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | Lina Ánh Nguyệt | 56 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, similarly, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39669421488 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03481382277 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623966942149 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.9444191229 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.111111111 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8888888889 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 7.06120827912 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353423059633 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149042984206 0.084324248473 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120354863714 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236982074712 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774906190452 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.