Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In present-day society, the ongoing intention about the importance of animals testing has been in discussion among humans and animals. There are advocators who support the cruel role of this act whilst the opponents are not favored using animals for research. In my opinion, although I believe that animals testing reserves a vital part in medical developments, people should have animal rights.
On the one hand, it is widely acknowledged that animals experimentation has been beneficial to humans in different ways. First of all, animal research is a necessary measure and the only safe way to save human lives. In other words, this research has saved and improved the lives of millions of people. People have probably all benefited from vaccines and antibiotics to prevent and treat infections, and anesthetics used in all forms of surgery. Furthermore, animals often make better research subjects than the human being because of their shorter life cycles. Laboratory mice, for example, live for only two to three years, so researchers can study the effects of treatments or genetic manipulation over a whole lifespan, or across several generations, which would be infeasible using human subjects. Mice and rats are particularly well-suited to long-term cancer research, partly because of their short lifespans.
On the other hand, the downsides of animal experiments are indispensable. It is true that animals testing is cruel and inhumane. It really depends on how the animals are being tested, a simple psychology experiment is different from giving an animal a disease or a tumor. According to the animal experiment procedures, animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force-feeding, forced inhalation, killing by carbon dioxide, neck-breaking, or others means. It is unfair and hateful to the animals. Besides, animal lovers suppose that if the problem is towards humans then humans should solve it themselves. In facts, More lives could be saved and suffering stopped by educating people on the importance of avoiding fat and cholesterol, reducing smoking, alcohol and other drug consumption, exercising regularly and cleaning up the environment than by all the animal tests in the world.
In conclusion, if the researcher had another choice, they would not test on animals. And people should have a wider concern for the well-being of all animals.
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future.Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 96
- The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia in 2010. 61
- The chart below shows average hours and minutes spent by UK males and females on different daily activities 56
- Meadowside village development 73
- Meadowside village and Fonton development over three periods (1962, 1985 and the present) 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...ne hand, it is widely acknowledged that animals experimentation has been beneficial to ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, if, really, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, in my opinion, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36997319035 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94848154177 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576407506702 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2329356313 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.421052632 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6315789474 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84210526316 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297382721511 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945242499871 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665131707677 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174897662626 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966736314478 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.