People have different views about whether or not an athletics event should be held by a nation. Whilst some maintain that organizing sporting events is an inconvenience, I believe it is a privilege for the host countries.
There are numerous reasons why people might argue that running an international sporting event has several drawbacks, one of which is financial concerns. A country planning to run an international sports event would invest a lump sum in constructing the sporting venues, such as hiring workers and engineers to design and erect them according to the blueprint. The large capital outlay on sports facilities, thereby getting a loan to meet the demands of the event’s requirement. Another justification for the athletics plan is that it is an inconvenience and leads to community disruption. Innumerable vehicles commuting on the road, which would in turn increase traffic jams, and road closures, and impact citizens living around the stadium. Residents would suffer from noise pollution due to the car horn sound and the voices of the fanatics.
Notwithstanding some critics’ objections, I support the view that hosting international sporting events reaps the benefits. First and foremost, it expects an influx of tourists and sponsors into the country; therefore, boosting economic growth and receiving the high rates of return on invested capital. For example, visitors traveling to the hosting country would choose to stay in a hotel near the tournament sites or even, or the audience would try traditional food and buy souvenirs in the stadium’s department stores. It should also be noted that holding an international sports event would contribute to a more sports-oriented and healthier society. For instance, worldwide audiences watching the match would have their favorite athletes so that they could learn from them and consider them role models to stay in shape and keep fit.
In sum, while there are sensible reasons to believe that staging major sporting events has drawbacks, my view is that they are outweighed by the benefits.
- The chart below show family expenditure in the UK between 1980 and 2010 56
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the united kingdom sweden italy and portugal between 1967 and 2007 84
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
People have different views about whether or not an athletics event should be held by a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35975609756 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95675755331 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600609756098 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2298431972 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.571428571 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235357345908 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853934881712 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728213589853 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153966967093 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421986427305 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
People have different views about whether or not an athletics event should be held by a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35975609756 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95675755331 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600609756098 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2298431972 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.571428571 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235357345908 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853934881712 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728213589853 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153966967093 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421986427305 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.