Nowadays many business meetings and training are happening online and not in real offices. Do you think advantages outweigh the disadvantages in this matter?
Technology has impacted on a variety of industries, including business and training. These days a huge proportion of people opt for removing interaction and keep pursuing online learning . The question of benefits of this approach emerges in a consideration. This essay will examine advantages and drawbacks and make a comparison. From my perspective, it is the controversial matter, however, merits overweight demerits.
On the one hand, it seems undeniable that preserving time is the main benefits of such way of communications. A person is not necessary to spend time to commute to the defined meeting point. And it is not compulsory to care about an attractive appearance, which also preparation . Moreover, according to the scientific educational statistic, numerous people have claimed that blended learning is the significant approach in the training process which allows to achieve a desired outcome, compared to using only face to face study methods. Blended leaning includes the great amount of online material, such as causes, articles, dictionaries, enhancing productivity of desired activity. Furthermore, browsing the Net is the conventional attractive way of the majority of people, probably, I will be a little bit wrong, if I acknowledge that the internet is omnipresent. So, the internet is being used by everyone anywhere , anytime, for instance, instead of being in a library, learning the subject, a person can acquire the background in a convenient position, in comfortable conditions at home, giving to rise the efficiency . Therefore, without a doubt, saving time , convenience of using online interactions, learning yields uncontroversial benefits.
On the other hand, it is worth remarking that a face to face interaction conveys the personal feelings, emotions, expressions which could be missed within a removing activity. For example, solving a math issue requires, in reality, a though work as well as a feeling work. Fortunately, the university's math departments in Russia, for instance, have not undergoing remove training causes . Nevertheless, in my point of view, removing activities add positive influence on any deal. As a result, some problems cause the necessity of face to face cooperations.
In conclusion, online interactions and trains bring significant positive effects, contributing human development.
- 92
- Wealth does not necessarily guaranty happiness To what extent do you agree with this statement 95
- Parents often give children everything they ask for and do what they like. Is it good for children? What are the consequences when they grow up? 73
- The tendency for human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashions in clothes and other consumers goods. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Inventors are not as important to society as doctors To what extent do you agree with this statement 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...action and keep pursuing online learning . The question of benefits of this approa...
^^
Line 2, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out an attractive appearance, which also preparation . Moreover, according to the...
^^
Line 2, column 279, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tive appearance, which also preparation . Moreover, according to the scientific e...
^^
Line 2, column 459, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'achieving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: achieving
...ch in the training process which allows to achieve a desired outcome, compared to using on...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 800, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...jority of people, probably, I will be a little bit wrong, if I acknowledge that the intern...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 920, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ernet is being used by everyone anywhere , anytime, for instance, instead of being...
^^
Line 2, column 1034, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ect, a person can acquire the background in a convenient position, in comfortable...
^^
Line 2, column 1126, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s at home, giving to rise the efficiency . Therefore, without a doubt, saving time...
^^
Line 2, column 1168, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Therefore, without a doubt, saving time , convenience of using online interaction...
^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ve not undergoing remove training causes . Nevertheless, in my point of view, remo...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ects, contributing human development.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63559322034 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33330439802 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7922541512 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6315789474 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21052631579 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.01903807615 219% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0893349662538 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0278381905044 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284203501951 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642675719325 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420453570573 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.