In days of yore, household chores were considered to be women’s duty, so people took it for granted that women had to do all the housework without any assistance from other members, particularly their husbands. However, with an increase of female full-time employment, some people, especially feminists, start to challenge this gender-biased concept, suggesting that men and women should equally share household chores. From my perspective, this egalitarian belief should be greatly promoted despite some manageable demerits.
Admittedly, we cannot be oblivious of several drawbacks of this gender-equal trend. One potential downside is that men are less experienced in dealing with household chores, and this is due to the fact that according to customs of many countries, many seldom take an active role in doing housework. As a result, they may end up doing household tasks in a less perfect way, which would lead to some unnecessary quarrels between partners and hindering their family bond. However, there is little likelihood of these happenings because wives can offer some tips or guidance to their husbands when they learn how to share house chores such as mopping floors or doing laundry.
In fact, the rationality of splitting housework equally should be recognized in the following reasons. First and foremost, there is no biological determinant for housework. No gender is physically predisposed to do the dishes or take out the trash. Second, it is unfair to impose the burden of all housework on women given the fact that their roles in modern society have changed tremendously over the years. Just like their fathers or husbands, women are also committed to their career during the daytime and suffer from considerably higher levels of work-related stress and anxiety. Therefore, they deserve proper rest after a day’s hard work as men do, or they might be overwhelmed with fatigue and stress, eventually compromising their physical and mental health.
In addition, splitting household duties evenly helps promote gender equality, fostering an environment with a strong emphasis on mutual support and respect. If parents share housework responsibilities, they convey to their children that women or mothers are not synonymous with housework; in other words, each family member should be accountable for the household chores. Better yet, housework sharing is an effective way to show love and care to our beloved ones, thereby conducive to a healthy marital relationship and a strong bond among family members.
In conclusion, although some conflicts might be triggered by equally splitting household drudgery, the benefits of this trend far outweigh its drawbacks. Hence, it is justifiable to believe that both genders should share housework.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at 73
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write about 150 words 73
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news more effectively through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same number of vacations in a year To what extent do you agree or disagree 100
- Task 2: Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answ 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2336.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 431.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41995359629 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87381940442 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 176.041082164 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610208816705 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5146209618 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.777777778 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9444444444 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120884756302 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381210580155 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343479956841 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709883758119 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302410616595 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.