Nowadays in many countries young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities. Is it a positive or negative development? Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
In present time, enormous number of young individuals are relocating from rural locations to developed cities. In my view, this trend has positive impact and also this essay will discuss both negatives and drawbacks. I believe that the benefits outweigh drawbacks.
To begin with, youngsters shifting from villages to developed cities is a positive change. Firstly, peoples relocating to cities will improve their standard of living. This is because in developed areas people can earn more from than the rural areas, which helps them spend money on their basic requirements. For example, people relocating from countryside to downtown of the USA will completely can their style of living. Secondly, young people who were struggling from unemployment in the rural areas after shifting to cities lead them to get better job. Consequently, moving to cities from undeveloped areas can provide better life and employment for individuals
However, young people relocating has both negatives and positives and positives are more then drawbacks. Moving to the advantages, this changes can provide more workforce for the cities, where it is required the most. For illustration, in India young people from villages to cities such as Hyderabad where 70% of MNC required workers. Nevertheless, there are also disadvantages of this trend such as development of rural areas will be stopped because enormous proportion of young people are shifted to cities.
In conclusion, youngsters moving from rural locations to developed locations is a positive change and after discussing advantages and negative effects, I also believe that benefits outweigh drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...es and positives and positives are more then drawbacks. Moving to the advantages, th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53754940711 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84321902996 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490118577075 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6923076923 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.769230769 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7692307692 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278338832311 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109737417131 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602340510514 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192331840285 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452831399043 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.