Nowadays most people choose to throw away broken things instead of repairing them, and replace them with new ones. Why is this happening? What problems may it lead to?
There is no escape from the fact that these days people are more willing to replace their broken stuff with new ones rather than going the path of replacing them. This essay would analyze the underlying reasons for this issue as well as the ill consequences it would bring about.
This phenomenon can be attributable to two principal factors. First, the advent of new technology has unfolded the possibility of daily updates in products of diverse categories which can compete with their previous versions in terms of quality and functionality. For example a state of the art mobile phone brings about a variety of accessories which are not comparable to the ones provided by their ancestors. Secondly, regarding the enhancements in advertisements industry, each individual is at liberty to be informed of the latest updates in marketplace. These causes consequently would foster the people in a society to become more passionate about upgrading their damaged equipment instead of repairing them.
The direst consequences of this emerging issue, however, are becoming more significant. On one hand, the environment would suffer as the demand for newly introduced products soars the need for natural resources like oil, water and wood; causing severe damages to the environment including deforestation and drought. On the other hand, the supporter of a family would undergo tremendous pressure in order to bear the burden of affording such replacements owing to the exorbitant costs of changing the furniture.
By way of conclusion, it is an undeniable fact that these types of luxury habits are doomed and the society would benefit if people put aside these types of behaviors.
- Nowadays, more people are migrating to other countries than ever before. In order tobecome integrated into society in their adopted countries, immigrants should abandon theirold ways and adapt to local customs and codes of behavior.Do you agree or disagre 33
- The graph illustrates the quantity of chicken beef lamb and fish consumed in a European country between 1979 and 2004 77
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 61
- Today, more school leavers are unable to find jobs. Discuss the adverse effects of rising unemployment amongyoung adults and suggest any solutions. 89
- technology effecting individual and society.do you agree? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, for example, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2936802974 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9031243817 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620817843866 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6809108525 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.454545455 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138071182129 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501541254175 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602514114201 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826075673464 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066930726387 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.