Large Shopping Malls Are Replacing Small Shops. Your Opinion? Good Or Bad
These days there is a controversial debate between members of society about the impacts of replacing small shops with large shopping malls. There are a great number of people who interpret the impacts of such practices as thoroughly constructive, while others hold an opponent view. I am inclined to believe that expanding shopping malls is beneficial and should be promoted.
There are several reasons why replacing small shops with large shopping malls is advantageous. First of all, it is argued that large shopping malls plays a pivotal role in economic prosperity the people. This is attributed to the fact that larger shopping malls would provide a great opportunity for employment and business, therefore all individuals would create a feeling of accomplishment and competence, which consequently open avenues to new achievements so that people's enthusiasm and determination would be amplified towards many daunting tasks. Take Iran, for example, even the least skillful men are now able to get a job thanks to the tremendous number of shopping centers in that country.
In addition, it is claimed that expanding shopping malls would benefit the buyers. This is to say that the customers would face more choices due to the vast variety of products available in big shopping centers, which would instill a strong feeling of self-esteem so that customers are more likely to achieve up to expectation goods compared to small shops. Specifically a recent study research conducted at Yale University in 2015 has found that big shopping malls would enhance people's intellectual abilities to be able to make better decisions for desired products.
To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounded the view that expanding shopping malls would enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the business market and would increase the consumer's confidence. It is expected that the governments take cognizance of these facts and start to adopt these types of shopping malls.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-06 | Sridarani | 75 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | y.yousefi90@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | y.yousefi90@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | Yuli | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-26 | woutan | 77 | view |
- ANY RECENT INVENTION THAT YOU THINK PROVED BENEFICIAL OR DETRIMENTAL TO SOCIETY 11
- Many people think that every individual is responsible for their own healthy lifestyle, others believe that governments should take care of it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- Some people believe that children should listen to and obey their parents. Others believe that children should think and do things on their own. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 85
- effects of tourism on developing countries.do you agree or disagree? 77
- IN EDUCATION SYSTEM, ASSESSMENT THROUGH FORMAL WRITTEN EXAMINATION STILL VALID? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
... business market and would increase the consumers confidence. It is expected that the gov...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 310.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39032258065 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9417320954 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570967741935 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.2660615394 50.4703680194 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.25 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279096621435 0.242375264174 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116663924327 0.0925447433944 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09662230399 0.071462118173 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166853919168 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512649805112 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.