Nowadays, people always throw the old things away when they buy new things, and we are living in a throw-away society. What fators cause this phenomenon? What problem does the phenomenon lead to?
It is universally acknowledged that old things are usually thrown away by individuals when they have the new ones. This issue is resulted by several factors, and it contribute to some problems.
To begin with, there are a numerous number of factors that cause a throw-away society. First and foremost, owning to the population explosion, the average area for each family is lower than the previous. Consequently, individuals usually clean old tools of their houses to free up more available space. In addition, people these days can purchase a range of items without the great effort due to lower prices compared with the past. This might reduce the value of old things, so individuals could easily abandon them. For instance, my friend had his electric lamp broken, and he was immediately throwing it away after bought a new one even this old lamp could be repaired.
A throw-away community could lead to several issues. Firstly, due to an enormous demand which is an aspiration for companies, the number of generated products is significantly increasing. This might contribute to the excessive exploitation of natural resources. For instance, a growing demand for wooden chopsticks would lead to deforestation. Secondly, a range of old items which are thrown would contribute to a garbage accumulation. Therefore, it might cause environmental pollution in the long term.
In summary, a throw-away habit could be a result because of several factors, and this phenomenon might have some negative impacts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'contributes'?
Suggestion: contributes
... is resulted by several factors, and it contribute to some problems. To begin with, th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tribute to the excessive exploitation of natural resources. For instance, a growi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in summary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25619834711 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9525653655 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599173553719 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9361176019 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.8 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1333333333 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249692029957 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791812330207 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763420814829 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155144151443 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319575750875 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.