Although it is widely known fact that people die of malnutrition as they are deprived from sufficient quantity of food, many people still continue to waste food. Perhaps offers on food ordering app deceit customers to order more, but right initiatives from government in collaboration with non-public organizations can curtail this to larger extent.
Predominantly there are two main reasons for this wastage. Firstly, tempting discounts on online food ordering lure many individuals to order more than what is required. These restaurants post visually appealing images to attract customers and these food delivery apps deliver food to door-steps at a click of a button. Secondly, burgeoning increase in big fat weddings by celebrities and rich people which compel them to show their wealth by serving exotic dishes by trying to cater to every guest. Eventually these extravagant celebrations lead to excess amount of food.
However, these issues can be resolved by taking simple and cognitive decisions such as, having alliance with orphanages, shelter homes, party halls. This will help in serving these underprivileged rather than throwing in thrash. BY this way even death due to hunger, malnutrition can be decreased significantly. Another innovative idea can be, installing public refrigerators at regular distance to motivate many individuals to come forward and preserve extra food for poverty-stricken individuals and these machines can be easily accessible. Finally, even corporate offices can install live dashboard to show the food in trash and how many unfortunate people could be served from this over supplied food. This initiative is ultimately trying to tap the emotional side of human being.
To recapitulate, if non-profit organizations and corporates in collaboration with innovative technologies can definitely bring down excessive preparation of food and excessive food can be utilized effectively.
- nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. why do you think people waste food? what can be done to reduce the amount of food that throw away. 84
- Many people are spending lot of money on their weddings. Do you think this is a good thing? 11
- Food travels thousand miles from farm to consumers. Some people believe we should but food from local farmer to protect the environment and help the local business. DO the advantages outweigh the disadvantages ? 84
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to write innewspapers. What factors influence these decisions? Do you think webecome used to bad news? Should more good news be reported? 56
- Food travels thousand miles from farm to consumers. Some people believe we should but food from local farmer to protect the environment and help the local business. DO the advantages outweigh the disadvantages ? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...pealing images to attract customers and these food delivery apps deliver food to door-step...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... non-profit organizations and corporates in collaboration with innovative technol...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66206896552 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11876679186 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658620689655 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9582699682 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.285714286 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306186537768 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100979043988 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834299067906 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196160515636 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399298872645 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.