The value and importance of food have been reducing in some demographics of society. Especially, people from the developed countries, also known as educated people, bought food more than they need and throw them out into the garbage recklessly. In this essay, I will explain why people waste food and what could be the potential solution in order to mitigate it.
There are two major reasons for wasting food including higher income and low-value for cheap products. First, Higher-income allows people to expense more. People purchased more food from shops and restaurants than they need, simply because they have high income and they think that less food is insufficient for them but more food doesn't matter. The second reason might be individuals have notions of valuelessness for cheap products. If foods can get very cheaper, people tend to purchase more, which will turn to waste ultimately. For example, in a country with a high-income Denmark, Danes bought an extra volume of foods and products when there are some discounts and sales even though are not needed for them, which will lead to being garbage.
However, there are some solutions in order to tackle this problem. People should know that food is money. In order to spread that knowledge, the government should hike the price of food which is wasted more. For example, From my personal experience, people in Denmark throws fruits most, and they are cheap also. So, the Danish government should increase the prices of fruits provided that people awareness.
In conclusion, because high income and cheap foods are the reasons people might waste food, however, the government could control it by increasing prices
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... is insufficient for them but more food doesnt matter. The second reason might be indi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oney. In order to spread that knowledge, the government should hike the price of ...
^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... throws fruits most, and they are cheap also. So, the Danish government should incre...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13090909091 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4686436869 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567272727273 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6566423026 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38473658017 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141864394446 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843009068506 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262724590261 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519436464777 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.