Nowadays, the question of whether students should learn academic subjects, such as chemistry, physics and history or practical subjects and cooking has been receiving a great deal of attention .Although studying academic subjects is not without advantages , vocational courses will be far more considered
There are a variety of reasons for studying academic subjects. Fist, since most graduates expect to land a decent job down the road, having access to academic courses is necessary. In fact, those subjects, such as Math or physics prepare for learners fundamental knowledge to do complex jobs, like doctors or engineers which require deeper understanding of nature of the subjects ,thus making them become competitive in labor markets. Second, by learning these subjects, students can continue higher education. This mean that they armed with special knowledge to do research or study, which is conductive to humans'innovation and development later on
There are a number of benefits of studying practical subjects. First, in order to make a living as soon as possible, having access to vocational courses is important. In fact, vocational training provides learners with a number of work experience without committing 4 years of college, which helps people get a well-paid job in the future, thus supporting themselves or raising a family. Second, by learning these subjects, students can help government in reaching a balance of labor markets. For example, the number of people having access to vocational courses become increasingly little in Canada and Japan, thus people choosing manual jobs, like cooking, cleaning can make a killing and help balance workforce in society
I
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... academic courses is necessary. In fact, those subjects, such as Math or physics ...
^^
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... understanding of nature of the subjects ,thus making them become competitive in l...
^^
Line 2, column 506, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a balance of labor markets. For example, the number of people having access to vo...
^^
Line 2, column 726, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng and help balance workforce in society I
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, thus, well, for example, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 217.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38248847926 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86491436004 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599078341014 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.3485151247 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.777777778 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103605286279 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469872410135 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371000704443 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843698041511 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437779380304 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.