Nowadays some countries encourage people to buy more and more products, which is good for the economy. While others believe it is bad for society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views about whether they should consume more goods to boost the country's economy. While in some ways it may seem reasonable for the government to support the residents buying more stuff, I personally believe that this trend would affect the community badly.
On the one hand, if many products are sold, the opportunity for people who plan to start up would be enhanced. Specifically, when the companies make a huge profit, the government would also get money by strict taxes. Those taxes revenues could be given to the potential entrepreneurs to set up their own business and compete in the domestic market or even international field. If these businesses are successful, the nation will have a huge income to develop their country, adapt to more cutting edge technology and even improve the residents' standards. Take Singapore for example. Owing to the entrepreneur policy, many businessmen were supported and got success, finally achieving their goals. Then, they use the profits to develop their own country.
On the other hand, encouraging dwellers to buy more goods brings a more serious problem: Environmental pollution. In order to manufacture goods, many materials are used and much more energy is needed. Moreover, this rampant consumerism would waste huge quantities of goods as they are being bought and thrown into dumpsters continuously. For instance, the fast fashion industry has recently been seriously condemned. The reason for this condemnation is that it consumes too many natural resources, which are noticeably used up, only for unsustainable purposes. If people keep using resources at this pace, it will soon run out and the civilization has nothing to use but trash.
In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be better, on balance, for residents to only buy enough goods which are their needs.
- In many countries people like to eat a wide range of food that cannot be grown in their local place Therefore much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions 84
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- Film were produced by big company in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 78
- In some countries parents expect children to spend a long time studying in and after school have less free time Do you think it has positive or negative effects on children and the society that they live in 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23489932886 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79316409941 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637583892617 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0096141996 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262880322519 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817914736522 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750192909278 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172030825656 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767105155157 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.