Nowadays some employers give increasing importance to employing people with social skills in addition to good qualification So it is widely accepted the social skills are as important as good qualifications To what extend do you agree or disagree

Traditionally, academic qualifications are considered as an essential factor for people to succeed in future career. Nowadays, some people claim that social skills play equally important role as academic qualifications. Personally, I agree with this view point to some extent.

Academic qualificationa cannot be obtained without continous practice, so they reflect a person's academic background and professional experience. Many companies require employees to possess a certain level of qualification which is for the evaluation of their knowledge and skills. Many people argue that a qualification is not the only criteria and in some cases, it may lead to wrong judgements. However, the qualification is still an important standard when other infomation is not available.

Apart from the academic qualifications, people have become more and more awar of social skills. A person with sophisticated social skills will find it comfortable to work with the others and cooperation is the key to succeed in complicated tasks. Moreover, relationship with colleagues enhances the efficiency in work places, giving people a sensation of sastisfactory due to their jobs. On the contrary,if people donot get along well with their workmates, they would suffer extra stress from their work. Futhermore, social skills would help people to enlarge the circle of friends and enhance their lives. With a good attitude towards other people, one could be able to deal wih all kinds of challenges in his life.

To summarize, a world when people are becoming competitive, one cannot succeed with only his qualification. Communication and cooperation with other people has become a vital part of our lifes and necessary social skills should not be ignored

Votes
Average: 6.7 (8 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...out continous practice, so they reflect a persons academic background and professional ex...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , if
...ctory due to their jobs. On the contrary,if people donot get along well with their ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, apart from, in some cases, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51865671642 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15086920085 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597014925373 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.3519925393 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.6 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257513347624 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876693682036 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738908779762 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15653302682 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665578261765 0.056905535591 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.