It is widely argued that art exhibitions and museums should be closed due to the development of technology such as computers. I partially agree with the above statement. This essay will first demonstrate the benefits of technological devices in visualizing artifacts, and then make a discussion about the positive outcome as these places still remain opened these days.
On the one hand, there is no room for doubt that computers bring people a brand-new experience as watching historical objects through online platforms. First of all, due to its convenience by a click of a mouse, people prefer this form of exhibition rather than conventional experience. On top of that, visitors always find it insecure whenever they come to museums or art galleries because there is a higher chance of wrongdoings like robbery, therefore, virtual experience at home is favored compared to the traditional method. Taking Vietnam as a prime example, where a wide range of painting exhibitions have been greatly uploaded on the Internet, free of charge, in order visitors to fully enjoy their visiting while sitting at home.
On the other hand, it is assumed that without the appearance of these sites, local residents will be negatively affected by many aspects. Firstly, the closing of museums leading to an increase in the unemployment rate deteriorates regional economics. This is because historical sites which are popular tourist attractions provide regional dwellers with an enormous financial budget in order to support their quality of life. Besides, museums or art galleries also offering job opportunities to a vast majority of the poor improve their living standards. For instance, due to the above reasons, the Japanese government still remains the conventional visiting to boost local economies as well as create jobs for many people.
In conclusion, the huge advancement of technology such as computers beneficially impacts on visitors in many ways, however, in terms of local destinations, there are several drawbacks of closing museums and art exhibitions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38888888889 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96131641493 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617283950617 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2712937435 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.307692308 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 7.06120827912 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169189341311 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054550792081 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363066835825 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911977187617 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217035077632 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.