Nowadays, some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works by using the computer. Do you agree or disagree?
In the age of information technology, many people believe that Internet can replace the needed of museums and art exhibitions since all historical objects and works are available on websites. I strongly disagree with this point of view for some reasons.
On the one hand, there are two main reasons that convince people to choose the Internet as the source of historical objects and works information. Firstly, the Internet provides audiences with an enormous amount of free historical information which is easily accessible in the most convenient way. Actually, by a finger click, people can access various kinds of information about an artwork from the author to materials. Secondly, online museums and exhibitions offer customers remarkable services that cannot be found at the real ones. For example, there are no opening time limit as well as unrestricted information data which cannot be served by real museums and art galleries due to the lack of capacities.
On the other hand, real museums and exhibitions are crucial and play as an indispensable part of the society. It is undoubted that firsthand experience is more interested than imagined experience. In other words, online-based information can never express adequate values of historic objects, but human experience of observing personally. Additionally, since museums and galleries are managed by a group of experts who have deep knowledge about the historical objects, the provided information is verified and more reliable. Furthermore, museums and art exhibitions place an important role in attracting foreigner visitors who are keen on understanding country’s cultural and traditional values and consequently contribute a significant proportion of government revenue.
To sum up, even though the online-based information is a great way to learn about historical works and objects, museums and exhibitions are still important for real experience and irreplaceable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-18 | Nguyen Phuong Anh | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-10 | officialrajpoot | 78 | view |
| 2020-06-02 | chinhsyflash | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | Chang Xu | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Chinkiarora | 85 | view |
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Most countries want to improve the standard of living through economic development. However, others think the social value is lost as a result of economic development. To what extent do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh its disadva 89
- Nowadays, some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works by using the computer. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people believe famous people’s support towards international aid organizations draws attention to problems. Others think celebrities make the problems less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 67
- Although more and more people read news on the internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 576, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'limits'?
Suggestion: limits
... For example, there are no opening time limit as well as unrestricted information dat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, as well as, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58983050847 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16259378129 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562711864407 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9261005355 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.846153846 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7692307692 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218330432566 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769726981944 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618197552235 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145348270433 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754978838794 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.