Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development?

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?

us">technology development is followed by the era. Interaction is simple for us as long as we want to connect with anyone, launch our social applications in the electronic devices is the only step. I believe that the advantages of this statement are outweighing the disadvantages.
us">To begin with, the mature technology makes us more closely with each other. For instance, the only way to meet a new person in the past must be on real life, we cannot know someone easily on the internet, the restriction causes the meeting methods narrow. But we can realize our dream now, send a message as well as have a conversation with our friends or families will be simple to complete if we are registered on social media or communication applications, like FACEBOOK or TELEGRAM. Also, we may add the unknown as soon as who gets the same interest with you via the social media. Therefore, the developed technology zooms in the distance of each person.
us">The modern technology is a positive development as far as we know how to control it. While it is convenient, frauds are existing on the internet. Take a known example as a reference, an elder people was lied by a fraud, a million dollars as well as the property of this elder were stolen. So, we must recognize the dangers on the internet if we are going to use it, hence, I believe that the development is positive after we learn how to distinguish the risk on the social media.
us">In conclusion, the latest techniques lead to a closely relationship during the world as well as each person. Although it may dangerous on some circumstance, I believe it is positive when we acknowledge the risk and use it with correct functions.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-23 cocococo123 61 view
Essays by user cocococo123 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Us&apos
us'>technology development is followed by ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Us&apos
...ent are outweighing the disadvantages. us'>To begin with, the mature technolog...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Us&apos
... zooms in the distance of each person. us'>The modern technology is a positive...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'lain'.
Suggestion: lain
...ple as a reference, an elder people was lied by a fraud, a million dollars as well a...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Us&apos
...tinguish the risk on the social media. us'>In conclusion, the latest technique...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('closely') instead an adjective, or a noun ('relationship') instead of another adjective.
...nclusion, the latest techniques lead to a closely relationship during the world as well as each person...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85324232082 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14394312692 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569965870307 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.396236092 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.571428571 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167940560311 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603362595271 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399104053204 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998185155488 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142905903796 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.