Nowadays the way many people interacy with each other has changed because of technologh In what ways has technology affected the types of relationship people make Has this become a positive or negative development

The contemporary society has been indulged in modern technology for most of their basic tasks like communication, technology has revolutionized communication, some believe this to be a positive impact, while others think it has negatively influenced social distancing. However, i do not agree with the second notion, the below essay will discuss my point of view and elaborate with relevant ideas.

The technological advancement has seen a study growth through many decades, moreover the breakthrough in the field of communication and social availability has crossed leaps and bounds. People are much closer to their family and friends than ever before. For example, we can now communicate with our friends who lives on the other part of the planet with a simple Whats app call, thereby, making communication more convenient than ever before.

Furthermore, technological development has influenced how relationships are made in the modern time, distance is just a number as we can see marriages, engagements done over Skype. For instance, COVID-19 pandemic has forced us to not leave the safety of our home, thereby restricting people to maintain an online commitment to their partner. The study done by Cambridge university students during the fall of 2020 showed, success rate of long distance relationship has increased a significant amount, thanks to the improvement in technology, which helped many to stay connected with the people they care for.

To conclude, modern technology has revolutionized communication which we all benefit, additionally it is much easier to maintain long distance relationships than ever before, in my opine this has positive impacts that over shadow the negative once.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... influenced social distancing. However, i do not agree with the second notion, th...
^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... other part of the planet with a simple Whats app call, thereby, making communication...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nnected with the people they care for. To conclude, modern technology has revol...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, as for, for example, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48484848485 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14969352948 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632575757576 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.3082738298 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.888888889 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202077666571 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754134004164 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.024136327986 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114527248855 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00893571569913 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.1 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.