Traditions are considered very unique to an individual society, although some believe that after technological revolution traditions are being undermined, i strongly agree with these people, i will try to explain my point with some relevant examples.
Firstly, the most important outcome of technological advancement is the internet. World Wide Web is now easily accessible compared to the old times, moreover mobile phone are the norm in the contemporary society therefor reinforcing the use of internet subsequently the exposure to the world is in your grabs through the intern, thereby people get to experience the wast amount of culture's of other regions and forget their tradition. For example in the recent decade, in my country western culture is the modern trend, therefor the youth are more indulged in it and forget their own traditional values, moreover they consider their own traditions old fashioned this i my opinion would be catastrophic to our own tradition, we should always try to embrace our ancestral believes.
Secondly, television, another product of the technological escalation. Which is now a obligatory device in every house hold. the content in this is mostly in a language which is widely accepted so that they could engage a wider range of audience, this centralization of a single language would eventually have its toll over the other, consequently the native tongue would be undermined. for instance Kannada is my mother tongue, as the youth find the shows in their own mother tongue less entertaining than comparatively to the foreign programmed therefor their own traditional language is undervalued.
In conclusion technological revolution is no doubt a boon and bane, furthermore the rapid growth of technology in our life is direct ripping our old and valuable traditions from our life's.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: VERY_UNIQUE[1]
Message: Use simply 'unique'.
Suggestion: unique
Traditions are considered very unique to an individual society, although some...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ed, i strongly agree with these people, i will try to explain my point with some ...
^
Line 3, column 771, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
...uld always try to embrace our ancestral believes. Secondly, television, another prod...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...try to embrace our ancestral believes. Secondly, television, another product of...
^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... technological escalation. Which is now a obligatory device in every house hold. ...
^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... obligatory device in every house hold. the content in this is mostly in a language...
^^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... the native tongue would be undermined. for instance Kannada is my mother tongue, a...
^^^
Line 8, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ogical revolution is no doubt a boon and bane, furthermore the rapid growth of te...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35640138408 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04498663101 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60553633218 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 107.005711166 49.4020404114 217% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 172.0 106.682146367 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1111111111 20.7667163134 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.3333333333 7.06120827912 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146667708995 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552414631393 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497646539561 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981618873761 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435543989448 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.0946893788 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.