There is a commonly held belief that constructing new railway lines which simplify the fast transportation between cities is necessary. However, some assert that it is a complete waste and the budget should be spent to solve existing transport problems.
To begin with, the most rational justification is that a large volume of money needs to building these railroads. Some people think that this statement could be used in other essential projects and improving existing roads is an irrational activity. That is if old and broken, society's public transports should be repaired. Take the accident rate in some developing countries which take place owing to poor and damaged public transport as an example. These accidents adversely affect society and possess irreversible injuries for people every year.
Yet another compelling argument is that new railway line benefits in this fast-changing world are by no means negligible. Simply put, it provides easy and comfortable traveling between cities as a frantic pace which is a crucial achievement. A good illustration is commuters who spend lots of their time on the roads between their homes and office every day. This in turn has a significant effect on their life from saving their time and energy to convenient traveling. Furthermore, new moving systems are eco-friendly and the most fuel-efficient. This is to say, they do not emit greenhouse gases and pollute the environment. working with electricity in place of burning fossil fuels, the new trains and also other forthcoming vehicles are clean and less harmful.
To sum up, considering the point discussed above, I believe that the most conclusion to be drawn is that the necessity of new railway lines is inevitable. It provides fast and efficient traveling along with the preservation of the environment.
- SOME PEOPLE SAY THAT THE BEST WAY TO IMPROVE PUBLIC HEALTH IS BY INCREASING THE NUMBER OF SPORTS FACILITIES OTHERS HOWEVER SAY THAT THIS WOULD HAVE LITTLE EFFECT ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND THAT OTHER MEASURES ARE REQUIRED DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi 78
- People in community now could buy cheaper consumer goods Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 39
- Some people think that old people need to live in special communities but others believe they should live with their family and adult children Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people think that changing jobs periodically is good Do you agree or disagree 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Working
...ouse gases and pollute the environment. working with electricity in place of burning fo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26896551724 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95723784097 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613793103448 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.0773157018 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331910269962 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842264546955 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632314670983 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185467122527 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803909086694 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.