In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Public transportation has become an essential necessity for people who want a cheaper and a more practical way of moving from a location to another. This essay discusses both arguments and agrees that the government should spend more on implementing faster trains that would make life easier.
In bigger countries, trains and metros are more reliable and faster when people want to travel from a city to another. This is especially true considering the fact that trains are faster, safer, and avoid traffic delays. In Malaysia for instance, train stations are even more needed than they were before because people find it difficult and pricier to take taxis especially when they are going to more distant provinces and areas. Trains made life easier for people especially students and employees and they are also cleaner for the environment considering how pollution is a critical problem today.
On the other hand, many people and government officials suggest that developing and implementing fixes on buses, taxi services, and other existing transportation means is more effective and less costly than building new metro stations and railways that most of the times need years to accomplish with no huge impact on the quality of life compared to buses and cabs that do not need as much effort to improve and have greater benefits for the public.
In conclusion, I feel inclined to agree that constructing new train stations and railways is more convenient than other transportation projects because the first provide safe and comfortable ways of moving between areas.
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheapand clean energy.The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th 61
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheapand clean energy.The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter trains that would make life easier. In bigger countries, trains and metros a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22440944882 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6956661576 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590551181102 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.820081752 49.4020404114 210% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 165.875 106.682146367 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.75 20.7667163134 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201655548392 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879445885765 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368413502899 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127501442006 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190521404881 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.