The number of students studying science at university is constantly declining What do you think are the causes What effects will this have on our society

Essay topics:

The number of students studying science at university is constantly declining. What do you think are the causes? What effects will this have on our society?

Education is the most powerful weapon which can be used to change the world. The preference towards study subjects often experiences changes with the passage of time. Presently, a constant down fall has been registered in the number of university students choosing science stream in many nations. This essay intends to account for reasons and effects of this happening on our society.

There are multifarious reasons behind this situation. First and foremost, unlike other subjects, science study is considered quite complicated and requires a great deal of intelligence, hard work and commitment.
For example, subjects such as physics and chemistry comprise highly complex lessons, experiments and empirical researchers. In response to such studies, scholars are subjected to burn midnight oil to accomplish respectable marks. What is more, it is also a fact that difficult studies make pupils mentally tired and frustrated when studying for many hours. Needless to say, the interest towards science is diminishing at an alarming rate in the nations worldwide. What is more, the number of job seekers in the field of science and technology is exceeding to availability of employment opportunities in respective stream. In India, for instance, a study of Hindustan times shows that every third student is mentally prepared to become a doctor, engineer or scientist. This is just because motivating for white collar high ranked jobs is a traditional approach of parents. This practice has led to a dramatic rise in the number of job searchers in the segment of science, resulting unemployment due to lack of jobs in science related fields at present. Therefore, nowadays, exploring bright future in other streams seems a better choice than opting science under traditional thinking.

As far as the effects of this phenomena are concerned, a massive loss to science institutions is quite common consequence of this situation. To be specific, science universities and colleges have been constructed by making huge investments. More noticeably, the annual expense including salaries, resource management and practical trainings of running such institutions is far more higher than other educational organizations. A significant reduction in the number of science students could be back breaking for science educational industry in terms of finance. Lastly, a country may deprive of prodigious professionals of science and technology if the tendency to avoid science continues to grow in the future.

To recapitulate, undeniably, discouragement towards science is not a good view point to witness in the whole world. Therefore, administrations should not only make efforts to make learning of science more interesting by encouraging changes in teaching approach but also hike the number of jobs in science to overcome the darker side of this trend.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (10 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 26, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...l thinking. As far as the effects of this phenomena are concerned, a massive loss...
^^^^
Line 6, column 378, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...ngs of running such institutions is far more higher than other educational organizations. A...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, may, so, therefore, third, for example, for instance, such as, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 31.0 8.3376753507 372% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2419.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 440.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49772727273 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07673806957 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 176.041082164 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584090909091 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8871274034 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.954545455 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77272727273 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2606159216 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688132632104 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500271821359 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134225621134 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437882136717 0.056905535591 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 78.4519038076 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.