Older people often say that their life was better in the past than it is now. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Discussing living in the present compared to life in the past, some elder people consider that they feel better in the past more than living in present. In my opinion, although I agree with the given statement I do not totally with this.
On the one hand, living in the past have many benefits in the elder people. Firstly, regarding the past, people probably had a peaceful life since a century ago. For example, the environment in the past has more trees, lake, fresh air, and less waste output. Thanks to, the elder people always feel relax and comfortable when they lived there. Secondly, there was no problem of traffic congestion that reason why everyone especially elder people often want to move their life to near the beach or rural areas because living in the past has less vehicle, sparse, and little pollution than the life grows as fast as now. Moreover, many years ago, the old life is less sick than it is now. Today, living in the developing country have more various food supplies which obviously include both fresh, dirty, and using many preservatives one compared to the century ago, the life is self-sufficient and they always use products by their own hands such as rice, vegetable, or something like that.
On the other hand, in the present time that is the industrialization and modernization, people always have a huge change in their life. Practically, people depend on machinery and instrument more than the past that helping their life have easier and more convenient. For instance, the internet brings people together and makes their work faster where within a millisecond people can send their messenger or make video calls to communicate with each together. Beside health facilities have developed in such a way that, death radio is remarkably low in the developing countries because saving the life has now become very easy.
In conclusion, I believe that both of the eras is important for our life. Living in the past have effective positive and negative.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-19 | Hoàng Thị Mỹ Phượng | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | arzoo saini | 91 | view |
- The table below shows the percentage of students giving good rating for different aspects of a university in China in 2000, 2005, 2010. 73
- The chart below shows International migration in UK. 78
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries; China and India. 61
- The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012. 67
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91394658754 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56600561639 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560830860534 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4252871739 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4666666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32347238955 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10646279281 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069723936117 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194998221892 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863457159018 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.