Online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary. To what extent you agree or disagree?
There is a topic of interest that whether traditional classes can be dispensed by e-learning in the modern day. While virtual classes have certain benefits, I believe that physical classrooms are unreplaceable.
On the one hand, there are some compelling reasons for the rapid growth of web-based classrooms. Firstly, it is more cost-efficient to learn on the Internet. Students can have access to a variety of online courses with low tuition or even join lessons in the form of livestreams on social media platforms like Facebook and Youtube without fees. Secondly, a virtual environment help overcomes time constraints and geographical boundaries. As people can choose lessons that suit their schedule, they can manage their time actively in order to work more eirrespecly. Moreover, online learning connects tutors and learners all over the world, irrespective of their nations or locations; therefore, it affords people in remote areas to enrich their knowledge to improve their lives.
On the other hand, in spite of some benefits I have mentioned, I contend that the conventional learning model is not expendable. One of the reasons is simply some fields require physical interaction. Especially in subjects require elaborate lab set-up and equipment like chemistry, physics and biology, it is impossible to learn in the comfort of one’s home. Furthermore, the classroom dynamic is often scarce in online classrooms. There is a lack of two-way interaction due to the loss of the Internet connection, students’ distraction, and many other factors that lead to the reduction in academic performance. In the contrary, being taught face to face provides learners with opportunities to hone their skills through live discussions, team-working activities, which e-learning can hardly emulate.
Conclusion: In conclusion, although virtual classes are beneficial to a certain extent, I think that brick and mortal operation still plays an important role in education and, thus, should not be eliminated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-13 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
- The digram below shows the plan for rebuilding shopping center in central town The maps below show the layout of a shopping mall before level 1 and after level 2 the construction 77
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 42
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 73
- Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Is this a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 706, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...ons or locations; therefore, it affords people in remote areas to enrich their knowled...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, as to, i think, in conclusion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50809061489 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06834348252 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618122977346 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7961503353 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.466666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0898453012369 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305520534206 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408280645994 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0620369378251 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286126589512 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.